Comcast Pairs Yellow Pages, TV for Local Search - MediaBuyerPlanner

Comcast Pairs Yellow Pages, TV for Local Search

Published on November 11, 2009

 

Yellow Pages on TV, a new initiative from Comcast, has married two emerging ad trends: local search and interactive TV advertising. The offering will enable viewers of a Comcast cable station to search for local businesses with their digital remote.

The service will feature both short commercials for specific local businesses and longer how-to videos that can be watched on-demand, writes MarketingVOX.

The new service, provided by FourthWall Media, also affords advertisers a number of reporting tools to track ad performance. The revenue potential is significant because of growing interest in local search and the $15 billion that print Yellow Pages ads traditionally bring in.

The business case for interactive local search ads has been well proven, first by Google online and more recently by social networks Facebook and Twitter. Local online advertising is expected to hit $14.2 billion by year’s end, a 12% increase over 2008, according to a report from Borrell Associates.

Interactive TV- not as well developed as search-ad technology - is also of interest to marketers, despite more limited options. Most have found television advertising less effective in the past two years, but are interested in exploring new ad formats and forms of video commercials, according to the Association of National Advertisers and Forrester Research.

In particular, marketers hope to be able to try out ads in online TV shows (65%), ads embedded in video-on-demand (VOD) (55%), interactive TV ads (43%), and ads within the set-top-box menu (32%), the study found.

Comcast has been experimenting with more than one of these techniques. Its new VOD ad insertion platform went live in Jacksonville, Florida, last month, allowing for the dynamic insertion of ads into its VOD inventory. Using technology developed by software vendor BlackArrow, the system enables advertisers to insert fresh ads into VOD streams on the fly.

 

Comments [0]

Reiter's Mobile TV Report: Reuters reports users prefer mobile video apps, not broadcast TV

Reuters headlines its article, “Apps a nail in coffin of broadcast mobile TV,” suggesting that cellular users prefer to pick and chose individual TV programs/channels and movies rather than accepting the traditional broadcast TV model with bundles of programs.

The article sees the future for mobile TV as downloading applications for specific video services, such as the apps available via Livestation (see below). 

Livestation mobile TV channels

 

Reuters notes that a survey by KPMG and the Mobile Entertainment Forum showed almost 40 percent of consumers had watched video on their handsets, and that 52 percent said the experience was “satisfying” compared to 38 percent of a much smaller number of consumers who had tried broadcast mobile TV.

What’s interesting to me is that only about half of the consumers had a satisfying experience downloading videos, which isn’t a particularly impressive number.  It’s not a statistic to be proud of.

Testing options

Reuters reports that handset manufacturers are testing different options.  For example, Samsung and Sony Ericsson are offering full length movies, Apple’s iPhone can download TV shows (and movies) and Nokia is working with the creator of the TV program “Heroes” to produce a cellular project for launch this summer on the Ovi Store.

Ben Wood, the research director at CCS Insight, says, “Old-fashioned broadcasters who are wedded to the old broadcast model have the biggest challenge because those days are over; consumers expect their favorite content when they want it, on whatever platform is most convenient — TV, PC or a mobile phone."

If this concept is indeed valid — and it remains to be seen — it doesn’t bode well for, as an example, Qualcomm’s FLO TV, which broadcasts regular TV programs on handsets, although not necessarily at the same times they are broadcast on the networks.

 

Comments [0]

Comments [0]

Do not adjust your set: a revolution in television as content moves online | Media | The Guardian

 

There's a revolution going on in television but you may not necessarily be watching it on the set in your living room.

Online viewing of programmes in the UK will more than triple in the next few years, according to the latest forecasts, boosted by new video on demand websites offering the best British and US shows to internet users for free.

UK viewers are not about to be able to watch all their favourite American shows on their computers for free – at least, not legally – as US studios and networks have lucrative deals with British broadcasters giving exclusive TV transmission windows for shows such as CSI, Lost, and Desperate Housewives.

However, mindful of how illegal file-sharing has damaged the music industry, broadcasters in the both the US and UK are creating partnerships to offer an increasingly wide selection of TV shows to internet users legally and for free.

In 2008 there were just over 1.6bn views of TV shows by UK internet users through free online TV services, according to research firm Screen Digest. This figure is forecast to jump to close to 5bn views by 2013.

British fans of critically lauded US drama Mad Men got a tantalising glimpse of what the future may hold for online TV viewing this week when – for a couple of days – the first episode of the third series was available to watch for free on the internet, nearly six months before the show will be broadcast in the UK on BBC4.

After what appears to have been a mistake by Mad Men's US broadcaster AMC, the episode is no longer available to view by UK internet users.

UK viewers are already accustomed to the idea of catching up with their favourite BBC shows, such as Doctor Who and The Apprentice, via their computer, thanks to the iPlayer.

Likewise, fans of Britain's Got Talent and The X Factor are logging on to the ITV.com website in increasing numbers to see video of Simon Cowell's latest catty put-downs.

The next development over the coming months will be the launch of competing video-on-demand websites offering TV shows from a variety of UK and US broadcasters all in one place.

"It feels like a gold rush is going on, everyone is seeing a big opportunity and jumping in," said Erik Huggers, head of the BBC's future, media and technology division.

"The number of entrants is staggering – the fragmentation reminds me of the music industry and all the digital offerings before Apple and iTunes came along."

Microsoft has already launched a pilot version of its MSN Video Player, offering a limited number of shows including Peep Show, Shameless and The Young Ones. Once MSN Video Player is fully up and running it is expected to be complementary to existing services such as the BBC iPlayer, with its seven-day catch up for current shows, offering older archive programming.

Microsoft will face competition from Hulu, a video-on-demand joint venture backed by News Corporation, NBC Universal and Disney.

Hulu – strapline "Watch your favourites. Anytime. For free"– is already up and running in the US, with the most popular shows on the website this week including Family Guy, The Tonight Show with Conan O'Brien, and Hell's Kitchen.

The joint venture is looking to do deals with British broadcasters for homegrown programming and has offered ITV a significant stake in its UK operation, which could launch early next year.

Google-owned YouTube has also been holding discussions with UK broadcasters about online programming rights as the video-sharing website attempts to move beyond short clips, often homemade, to offer full-length TV shows.

The other contender lining up to launch a video-on-demand website is Arqiva, the company that owns the UK's TV and radio transmitter network. Arqiva has yet to announce any deals with broadcasters for programming but is reported to have reached agreements with Channel 4 and the BBC for some content.

"We welcome competition in the market, it means more and more quality content and more choice for viewers," said Pierre-Jean Sebert, chief executive of the as yet unnamed Arqiva online video venture.

"We believe we are very well placed to play an aggregation role online [of TV shows] and be one of the main players."

Around the fringes there are smaller players, including BlinkBox, which offers films and shows from partners including BBC Worldwide and Shameless-maker All3Media, and Joost, which has admitted it is struggling to find a viable business model.

The biggest issue for ITV, Channel 4 and Channel Five, which are also trying to build their own online TV services, is how much control over programming and ad revenue might have to be given up in each deal on the table.

While negotiations between the parties continue, Five has just struck a deal with Sony to provide on demand TV shows directly through its next internet-enabled TVs,

However, the BBC's Huggers warned that consumers may find navigating the new world of competing video-on-demand services difficult.

"What is happening is everyone is trying to get in there and that is confusing for consumers," he said.

"And there will be more entrants to come. For the companies in the space there will be a shake-out as scale and critical mass is critical.

"The services that have the right mix of content and strong brand name will see it through."

At the moment these online TV services can mostly only be accessed via a computer screen.

However, another development in the pipeline is for video on demand services to be available more widely via traditional TV sets, offering a better viewing experience.

The BBC estimates that one-third of all iPlayer viewing comes via the video on demand service offered to Virgin Media's 3.6 million cable subscribers via their TV sets.

In partnership with ITV, Channel Five and BT, the BBC is also developing Project Canvas, which will make TV shows available on a video on demand basis to millions of Freeview and Freesat viewers.

Project Canvas is due to launch next year, although it is facing criticism from rival companies including BSkyB, claiming it could dominate the burgeoning market for video on demand and stifle competition.

Five has also this week signed a deal with Sony to make shows including Neighbours and Home and Away available via a new internet video service that will come built into the next generation Bravia TV sets that go on sale from next year.

 

 

BBC iPlayer's most popular shows

Web users made 45m requests to watch TV programmes on the BBC iPlayer in July. The service's top 10 most requested shows in the 12 months to the end of March were:

1 EastEnders

2 Top Gear

3 Doctor Who

4 The Apprentice

5 Live at the Apollo

6 Merlin

7 Gavin and Stacey

8 Mock the Week

9 Waterloo Road

10 Never Mind the Buzzcocks

 

Comments [0]

International Business Etiquette, Culture, Manners and Geert Hofstede Cultural Analysis for Global Business Students & Managers

Knowing and applying proper etiquette and manners in  conducting international business is essential for successful global executives, managers, and employees  Etiquette, manners, and cross cultural, or intercultural communication have become critical elements required for all International and Global Business executives, managers, and employees. As international, multinational, transnational, multi domestic, and global business continues to expand and bring people closer, the most important element of successful business outcomes may be the appreciation and respect for regional, country, and cultural differences - known as cultural diversity.

International Business Etiquette, Manners, gift giving, dress, comunications, behavior, protocol, customs, greetings, and more.  Learning the skills of proper etiquette, manners, and intercultural communication contained in these pages of the International Business Etiquette and Manners website will give you a wealth of information and resources that you can immediately apply during your international business travels and overseas assignments. In fact, you may want to print a copy to review during your next international flight.

College and University Professors use the International Business Etiquette and Manners Website to teach their Global Business School Students  This Site is recommended and used by college professors to teach their business school students the importance of understanding the uniqueness of cultures around the world and how to apply the skills of cultural understanding to become more successful in the global business environment.

 

Comments [0]

Nonverbal Communication: A Cultural Perspective

November 26, 1997

NONVERBAL COMMUNICATION CHANNELS

 

a. Proxemics -- Use of space.

The amount of closeness between speakers, the arrangement and use of space in cities, homes, offices. Architecture and Interior Design. People have an invisible space around them which is their own. Size differs by culture.

 

b. Haptics -- Touch

The amount of contact or non-contact between people as they speak.

 

c. Kinesics -- Body Movement of head, eyes, shoulders, lips, eyebrows, neck, legs, arms, fingers. Also posture, stance, walking.

Part of Kinesics is Gestures--Can be specific to a culture, class, family, or individual. William Condon's research shows us that speech and gestures are totally synchronized: speech calls the tune and gestures follow.

Types of Gestures:

Emblems: gestures consciously or unconsciously used by members of a society in addition to or instead of words. They have a fixed, accepted meaning.

Illustrators: less standardized; they elaborate or comment on the content of accompanying speech.

----

Types of illustrators:

Batons: stress a word or phrase

 

Ideographs: movements which indicate the direction of thought

Spatial movements: show the spatial relationships, positions of two objects

Rhythmic movements: show the pacing of a event

Pictographs: movements drawing pictures in the air

Affect Displays: show emotions

Regulators: filler words like "um" which indicate that the person wants to keep talking.

All used to enhance comprehension of speech and to reveal information about the speaker's attitudes and emotions. Use illustrators less when we are tired, apathetic, in a subordinate or formal relationship, or are having a difficult time conveying our message to the listener. Everyone has had the experience of talking with their hands.

 

d. Monochronism/Polychronism --The time organization of interpersonal relationships (one at a time, or many at a time).

 

e. Facial Expression -- What does it mean? What is it used to express?

 

f. Eye contact -- Degree, frequency: staring, quick glances, none, etc.

 

g. Sound -- drum signals, smoke signals, factory whistles, police sirens

 

h. Laughter/Play -- What causes laughter? By whom? How do children play? How do people entertain themselves?

 

i. Greetings/Farewells -- How are they done? Brief? With warmth, or formality?

j. Paralanguage -- Tone of voice, intensity, pitch, extent (drawl and clipping) speech rate, inflections, timing and pauses

 

k. Frankness -- Are messages straightforward? Curt? Rude? Reticent? Honest?

 

l. Time -- Punctuality, and attitude toward it. Past-, present-, or future-orientation?

 

m. Privacy -- Do people need it? Shows how they approach forming relationships.

 

n. Use of Silence -- What does it mean? Respect? Ignorance?

 

o. Appearance -- Projection of how we feel and how we want to be seen by others. Clothing, jewelry, cosmetics (powder, lipstick, tattoos)

 

p. Art and Rhetorical forms -- wedding dances, political parades

 

q. Smell--body odors, perfume, incense

 

r. Color symbolism

 

s. Taste -- symbolism of food, the communicative function of the tea ceremony, smoking, chewing gum

 

t. Thermal influences -- sensitivity to heat, influence of temperature on communication.

 

u. Symbols -- universally recognized images

   

 

 

 

This page was created on November 11, 1997 by Paula Dosch-Haworth for "Art, Culture and Virtual Mobility," a Distance Learning course at the University of Art and Design, Helsinki, Finland.

 

 

Comments [1]

City of Lost Children Trailer

Ron Perlman of Hellboy learnt his lines in French as the only non-French in this 1995 film. It played on the French movie channels a few days back when I caught it, and I really love the treatment - considering it was filmed over 10 years ago.

Comments [0]

The Europeanization Of America

pic

In 1944, the Austrian economist F.A. Hayek published an extraordinarily influential book, The Road to Serfdom. In it, he argued that liberalism eventually leads to totalitarianism; that is, once a nation has embarked on the creation of a welfare state, there is no natural limit to the size of government until it controls everything, socialism becomes pervasive and political freedom evaporates.

It is an argument that made sense at the time Hayek made it. Liberals were indeed soft on communism in those days and engaged in a massive expansion of government throughout Europe. In England, where Hayek was living when he wrote his book, much private industry was being nationalized, cradle-to-grave welfare programs were being instituted and many of those advocating such measures were not shy about pointing to the Soviet Union as a model to follow.

Article Controls

Email

email

image

print

image

reprint

image

newsletter

comments (75)

image

share

image

del.icio.us

image

Digg It!

http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=39255/SIG=123j9cm40/**http%3A%2F%2Fwww.forbes.com%2Ffdc%2Frss.html%3Fpartner%3Dmyyahoo">image

yahoo

image

Facebook

http://www.forbes.com/2009/11/12/europe-america-taxes-health-opinions-columnists-bruce-bartlett.html">image

Twitter

image

Reddit

image

rss

Yahoo! Buzz

Since Hayek's book appeared, it has been an article of faith among American conservatives and libertarians that every expansion of government is a step on the slippery slope to totalitarianism. National health insurance today, the gulag tomorrow, many of those on the right genuinely believe, often citing Hayek in support.

Consequently, it is axiomatic that Europe, which is much further along the road to a welfare state than the U.S., is also further along the road to socialism and totalitarianism. Thus it is a grave insult among conservatives for one to be accused of wanting to Europeanize the American economy. It is only a small step removed from being called a communist or Marxist. The difference is only one of degree.

I am often accused of wanting to Europeanize America these days--my friend Larry Kudlow always says so--because I think the magnitude of our fiscal problem is so large that a significant tax increase is inevitable, and that the magnitude of that tax increase is so great that we will eventually need a value-added tax because it will be impossible to get enough revenue through the income tax. Raising income tax rates enough to plug our fiscal hole would be much too debilitating, economically.

Real-Time Quotes
Get Quote

In the conservative mind, the VAT, which is embedded in the prices of goods, is the foundation upon which the European welfare state rests. Without its enormous revenue-raising capacity the Europeans never could have financed their welfare states. In short, without the VAT there would be no welfare state in Europe, government would be smaller and the threat of totalitarianism would be much less, conservatives reckon.

By advocating a VAT, I am, in effect, advocating totalitarianism, many of my friends believe. If we institute a VAT it will be like pouring gasoline on the fire of big government. It will get bigger overnight. The only thing holding this country back from having a welfare state as large as Europe's, conservatives argue, is the low level of taxation that most Americans are loath to abandon. Thus in their own minds, conservatives believe that holding the line on taxes, no matter how large the deficit, is the essential prerequisite for the preservation of liberty.

The only problem with this analysis is that it has no factual basis whatsoever. If Hayek were even remotely correct, all of Europe would be one huge gulag by this time. At the very least, Europe would be mired in poverty, growth nonexistent and freedom hanging on by the thinnest of threads.

Of course, that is not the case at all. According to Freedom House, virtually every country in Europe has just as much political freedom as we do. Even organizations like the Cato ( CTR - news - people ) Institute and the Heritage Foundation, which seem to think that the tax burden is the single most important measure of freedom, concede that many European countries with tax burdens that would be considered confiscatory by all conservatives and probably most Americans are in fact just about as free as we are.

For example, according to the Heritage Foundation's rankings the United States has a freedom score of 80.7 (out of 100), but Denmark, where taxes consume 49.1% of the gross domestic product (versus 28% here, according to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), has a ranking of 79.6. If the Danes weren't so heavily penalized for their high taxes, they would actually rank well above us. The same is true of the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and many other heavily taxed European countries that rank higher than us in terms of monetary freedom, financial freedom, investment freedom and other measures calculated by Heritage.

Nor is Europe some pit of poverty. While it is true that most European countries have a lower GDP per capita than the U.S., it is not true that they have grown more slowly. According to economist Angus Maddison, between 1990 and 2006 the following countries all had higher growth rates of per capita GDP than we did: Austria, Denmark, Finland, Greece, Ireland, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden and the U.K. And even those that grew less mostly grew only a little less than we did. The 30 nations of Europe for which Maddison calculated growth rates grew 28.02% while the U.S. grew 29.31%. Interestingly, the nation with the slowest growth was Switzerland, the one with the lowest taxes among major European countries.

Americans generally believe that the overall quality of life is better here than in Europe, but this belief is based more on chauvinism than reality. According to a new book, The Narcissism of Minor Differences by UCLA historian Peter Baldwin, there is no significant difference overall in the quality of life in Europe and here. While the U.S. ranks higher in some ways, many European countries rank significantly higher in others.

According to Baldwin, among the ways most Europeans are better off than most Americans: Europeans have more leisure time (paid vacations, public holidays); more hospitals per capita; lower infant mortality; higher life expectancy; lower rates of obesity; lower murder and incarceration rates; lower poverty rates; better restaurants; and greater income equality. The U.S. scores higher in areas such as lower taxes; less state control of industry; less labor regulation; higher wages as a share of GDP; fewer suicides; lower incidence of stomach cancer and stroke mortality; higher breast cancer survival rates; lower percentage of the population on disability; more living space; more people with college educations; more patents; more charity, volunteer work and participation in civic organizations; more blood donations; and higher religiosity.

Baldwin might also have noted that business profits and investment are higher in Europe than the U.S., according to the European Union. Manufacturing productivity is higher in many European countries, including Sweden, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Income mobility is higher in many European countries, according to the Brookings Institution. And when it comes to taxes, 70% of EU countries have cut their top income tax rates since 2000 and every EU country save one has a corporate tax rate lower than ours.

Presumably, we are mostly better off in ways we think are important and Europeans in ways they consider important. Trying to draw a conclusion about who is better off on balance is impossible because it involves comparing interpersonal values. Perhaps the only thing that really matters is whether people are happy or not. On this score, there are many Europeans who are, in general, happier than we are, according to an OECD study. Based on survey data the people in these European countries are generally happier than Americans: Denmark, Ireland, Switzerland and the Netherlands. Those in Austria, Luxembourg, Norway, Sweden, France and Belgium seem to be about equally as happy as we are. Among wealthy countries, the Germans and Italians appear to be considerably less happy, for some reason.

I don't mean to imply that Europeanization is unambiguously good; only that it's not unambiguously bad, as virtually all conservatives believe. There are many ways I think we could learn from the Europeans and they from us. One way we can learn from them is how to have a tax system that raises considerably more revenue as a share of the economy than ours does without killing the goose that lays the golden eggs.

At a minimum, I think it's safe to say that Hayek was wrong about the inevitability of totalitarianism arising from growth in the size of government. The collapse of communism is proof enough of that. Nor does it appear that the welfare state necessarily erodes freedom or places a crippling burden on the economy. As Columbia University economist Jeffrey Sachs recently wrote, "In strong and vibrant democracies, a generous social-welfare state is not a road to serfdom but rather to fairness, economic equality and international competitiveness."

Bruce Bartlett is a former Treasury Department economist and the author of Reaganomics: Supply-Side Economics in Action and Impostor: How George W. Bush Bankrupted America and Betrayed the Reagan Legacy. Bruce Bartlett's new book is: The New American Economy: The Failure of Reaganomics and a New Way Forward. He writes a weekly column for Forbes.

Read more Forbes Opinions here.

And why not? Historically, aside from the native Indians who occupied the land, it's the Europeans, Chinese and everyone else from around the world that came to America in the first place. America's history isn't as deep as those of Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia anyway.

Comments [0]

Europe's Happiest Places

Life is good in Denmark. The country’s unemployment rate is enviably low, its economy is relatively healthy (the country boasts a $68,362 per-capita GDP) and a large majority of Danes are satisfied with their quality of life and expect it to continue.

That’s according to a new report released by the Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD), a Paris-based group of 30 countries with democratic governments that provides economic and social statistics and data. The report shows happiness levels are highest in Northern European countries.

Finland and the Netherlands also rated at the top of the list, ranking second and third, respectively. Outside Europe, New Zealand and Canada landed at Nos. 8 and 6, respectively. Switzerland placed seventh and Belgium placed 10th.

In Depth: Europe's Happiest Places

The report looked at subjective well-being, defined as "life satisfaction." Did people feel like their lives were dominated by positive experiences and feelings, or negative ones?

To answer that question, the OECD used data from a Gallup World Poll conducted in 140 countries around the world last year. The poll asked respondents whether they had experienced six different forms of positive or negative feelings within the last day.

Some sample questions: Did you enjoy something you did yesterday? Were you proud of something you did yesterday? Did you learn something yesterday? Were you treated with respect yesterday? In each country, a representative sample of no more than 1,000 people, age 15 or older, were surveyed. The poll was scored numerically on a scale of 1 to 100. The average score was 62.4.

Why did the Northern European countries come out looking so good? Overall economic health played a powerful role, says Simon Chapple, senior economist from the Social Policy Division of the OECD, which put together the report.

While the global economic crisis has taken a toll on every nation, the countries that scored at the top still boast some of the highest per-capita gross domestic products in the world. Denmark, which got the highest score, is not only a wealthy country, it's also highly productive, with a 2009 GDP per capita of $68,000, according to the International Monetary Fund. The U.S.'s GDP per capita, by contrast, is $47,335. Though the U.S. got an above-average score of 74, it did not break the top 10.

But wealth alone does not bring the greatest degree of happiness. Norway, for example, has the highest GDP per capita on the list--$98,822--yet it ranked ninth, not first. On the other hand, New Zealand's happiness level is 76.7 out of 100 on the OECD scale, but its 2009 GDP per capita is just $30,556.

According to a 2005 editorial published in the British Medical Journal and authored by Dr. Tony Delamothe, research done in Mexico, Ghana, Sweden, the U.S. and the U.K. shows that individuals typically get richer during their lifetimes, but not happier. It is family, social and community networks that bring joy to one's life, Delamothe says.

The OECD data show that another important factor is work-life balance. While Scandinavian countries boast a high GDP per capita, the average work week in that part of the world is no more than 37 hours. In China, which got a low score of just 14.8, the average work week is 47 hours and the GDP per capita is just $3,600.

Low unemployment also contributes to happiness. "One thing we know for sure," says the OECD's Chapple, is that "not having a job makes one substantially less satisfied." Denmark's unemployment rate is just 2%, according the C.I.A.'s World Factbook. Norway's is just 2.6%; the Netherlands, 4.5%. Many economists concur that a 4% unemployment rate reflects a stable economy. The U.S. unemployment rate is currently 9.4%.

In Depth: Europe's Happiest Places

 

Comments [0]

Comments [0]

About

Si hoc legere scis numium eruditionis habes ... but welcome anyway to my pseudo subversive realm.

This is what I consider my visual blog and where I post daily dosages of inspirational web sites and information I want to remember. "A picture is worth a thousand words" - so they say, pictures also help me remember easily.

I guess that would ring true for everyone! :)